Chandragupta Maurya & Qin Shihuang were rulers of their own empires. Share with the rest one similarity and one difference in the way they ruled their respective empires.
Cheers, Mr Syed
40 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Hi,Mr Syed Qin Shi Huang, after conquering the last independent Chinese state in 221 BCE, Qin Shi Huang was the king of a state of Qin ruling over the whole of China, an unprecedented accomplishment. He has curel punishments on people who obey him. Chandragupta Maurya was the king of Maurya. His achievements, which ranged from defeating Alexander's Macedonian satrapies and conquering the Nanda Empire by the time he was only about 20 years old, to defeating Seleucus Nicator and establishing centralized rule throughout Southern Asia, remain some of the most celebrated in Indian history. He had harsh punishment on his men which obey him. Thus, I think they was both good ruler as they contribut many things to their country. name: angie lim class:1E3
Well,i guess im the first to give the comment...XD Ermm...between chandragupta and qin shihuang..I think that chandragupta would make a better ruler than qin shihuang as chandragupta improved the welfare of his people..He build roads,including the Great Royal highway for easy travel..I'm not saying that qin shihuang never improve the welfare of his people.. He do contritute a lot to China's history not to his people. To the people at that time, he is definitely a tyrant, a horrible king. He killed lots of scholars and burned many classic books. And thousands of people died during the construction of the great wall... Nadia shariff(8) 1E3
both chandragupta maurya and qin shihuang were cruel rulers.they executed or severly punished those who are foung guilty or being disloyal.chandragupta maurya shared his kingdom with who he thinks that are loyal support him.while qin shihuang did not shared his kingdom with anybody.
They were both strict with their rules and regulations and even killed people to prove to the public that they were strict with the rules. However they also wanted to show that if you followed the rules,they both would be happy.The difference is that the caste system treated the untouchables like slaves while the class system did not have people like the untouchables. stefan 1A2 greendale secondary school
Chandragupta Maurya and Qin shihuang have their own similarities on how they each ruled their repective empires......i think Chandragupta Maurya was a better ruler because his punishments were never harsher than QinShihuang....even thoughh his punishments wrer also bad....he was never bad to the people under him....Qin Shihuang was very harsh with his punishments....he even sent his own son to another country.....a similarity with the both of them would be that both wanted to rule their respective empires powerfully and without any doubt,both of them were very power ful rulers
Their Similarity Is That Chandragupta Maurya And QinShihuang Ruled Their Empires Strictly And Cruelly. Their Difference Is That Chandragupta Maurya Has A Centralized Rule,Where His People Were Divided Into Provinces Under The Rule Of A trusted Governor While QinShihuang ruled by fueldalism Where People Had Land given By The King In return For Their Support.
The similarity is thier empire was divided into provinces and the difference are Maurya is a centralized empire while the Qin Dynasty use a govenment system called feudalism.
Chandragupta Maurya and Qin Shihuang similar rule is they rule their own empire. Their differences is Chandraguta Maurya central rule and Qin Shihuang rule iseulcalism. (apphia kang) (1e3)
I think 1 different thing between chandragupta maurya and Qin Shihuang was despite harsh punishments to the people, chandragupta is still also known to have improved the welfare of people...but qin shihuang enforced strict laws and not even showed any mercy at all!!The 1 thing similar between both was they both contributed many thing to the country...
they are both strong and powerful but chandragupta helped many people and Qin Shihuang killed many people
chandragupta would make a better ruler than qin shihuang as chandragupta improved the welfare of his people..He build roads,including the Great Royal highway for easy travel..I'm not saying that qin shihuang never improve the welfare of his people.. He do contritute a lot to China's history not to his people. To the people at that time, he is definitely a tyrant, a horrible king. He killed lots of scholars and burned many classic books. And thousands of people died during the construction of the great wall,he even send his son away
hi,mr syed Qin shihuang is a very curel man that is so unreasonable.He do not have to send his son to another contry just for disagreeing with him and can talk things out but he is so curel that he did not even care about his own son and just send his son to another country so i find him very unreasonable. name:benny hong class:1A2
Hi, Sry for posting so late... I think that Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya have their good and bad contribution to the society. But I think that at least Chandragupta Maurya help his people by buildings roads and including Great Royal Highway for easy travel. Qin Shi huang can be considered a horrible king as he had killed many innocent life. Jia Ying 1E3 Greendale Secondary School
Hi, To me I think that Chandragupta maurya is better than Qin Shi Huang. It is because Qin Shi Huang had killed many innocent lifes compared to Chandragupta Maurya he still have consideration for his people he will try to help them by building roads and The Great Royal Highway for easy travel. The highway connected Pataliputra to the northwestern border areas of Chandragupta's empire.Farmers were able to grow their crops more easily when Chandragupta ordered irrigation systems be maintained to ensure a steady supply of water to the fields. Dorcas Koh 1E3 Greendale Secondary School
THE SIMILARITY IS THAT BOTH THE CHANDRAGUPTA MAURYA&QIN SHIHUANG EMPIRES HAD DIVIDED THEIR PROVINCES AND THEY WERE BOTH VERY CRUEL PEOPLE. 1A2 Greendale
Chandragupta and Qin shihuang are both great rulers.The difference between them is Chandragupta set up a war office that consisted of thousands of soldiers and war elephants and Qin shihuang has stict laws.
hi..their similarity is they ruled their empires cruelly.their difference is that Chandragupta Maurya has central rule and differences are Maurya is a central empire while the Qin Dynasty use a govenment system called feudalism.
Hi,mr syed Qin shi huang was the ruler who subjugated the Warring States and formed China in 221 B.C. He declared himself the first emperor of China and named himself Shi Huangdi (meaning First Emperor). He had a lot of cruel punishemnt on those who did not obey him . All the scolar were buried alive and book we burn that mean he did not want people to rebel him.He also send his son to exlie of other country.one of his great contribution are he build great wall to prevent the people from attacking. Chandragupta wans the kign of maurya.He untited contry of india and establsing then centralized rule of southen asia. He had harsh law for people who did not obey him. Thus i think they two ruler have negative and postive contribution.so we could not judge both are them are good ruler.
Qin Shi Huang is a man that independent Chinese state in 221 BCE.He is a very cruel man.He is same as chandragupta.They punish people so at the end of the day they were fear of him. NAME:Jonathan CLASS:1E3
Both Chandragupta Maurya & Qin Shi Huang were cruel rulers.They both had harsh punishments. But I think that Qin ShiHuang was more cruel than Chandragupta Maurya as Qin ShiHuang killed those people that were innocent and if the person had done wrong the person 's family including that person will be excuted.
I think that Qin ShiHuang was a bad ruler as he is violence and harsh ,, even his son was sent away ... He did all the voilence in order to show a good example to the emperor ... that's not worth it i think ... And Chandragupta Maurya was a good ruler , he had beaten his opponent ,, Alexander ...He is a good ruler ... although he is violent but , he's not as voilent as Qin Shi Huang ... he's a better ruler than Qin Shi Huang ... I think that he ought to be the emperor ... hahas ...
Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta maurya were both a bad ruler. Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Muarya does cruel punishments like excuting or punishing people who were guilty and does not obey them.
both of them are very cruel and evil.they have killed many people.but they are different, chandragupta maurya is in India but Qin Shihuang is in china.
Hi Mr Syed, Qin Shihuang is a great ruler.In 221 BCE,feudalism ended and was replaced with a centralised government.It is also known as Unitary System Of Government.A prince defeated the other Shi to unify China and establish the Qin Dynasty. Later,he took on the title of 'Emperor'(Huangdi) and called himself Qin Shihuang,or 'First Emperor Of Qin'.This change from feudalism to a unitary system of government is often reffered to as China's imperial unification.
Hi Mr Syed, Qin Shi Huang is a bad,curel and evil ruler which kills and tourture people that disobey him.And Chandragupta Maurya is a better ruler as comepaired to Qin Shi Huang beacuse he is a emperor and why would people make him the emperor it is beacause people thinks that he is a ruler thats why...
HI........ The difference is One is chinese,another is India! The similiarity is they are both emperor!!I think Qin Shihuang is a very kind and cruel king.
Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta is very cruel.but Qin Shi Huang is even cruel as he punish his own son. He did all the voilence in order to show a good example to the emperor .He also killed those people that were innocent.
The difference betweenn Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is that they both are different religion. The similarity between Qin Shuang Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is they both are emperors. The another simliarity is they are are the most powerful kings would take overthe kingdoms of his weaker rivals to form an empire. The another difference between Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is Qin Shang Huang is China emperor,and Chandragupta Maurya is the emperor from india.
yo mr syed, qin shihuang was the king of a state ruled by qin shi huang he is also a cruel ruler cause he punishers people who disobeys him. from;IMRRAN the great.
The similarity is their empire was divided into provinces.The difference between them is Chandragupta set up a war office that consisted of thousands of soldiers and war elephants and Qin shihuang has strict laws.Qin shihuang is so creul that he even banish his son to another contry for disagreeing with him.
Hi, The different is that chandragupta maurya 's leadership was highly organised while Qin shihuang was not highly well organised.The different is that Qin Shihuang was infamous because he is very cruel while Chandragupta Maurya was famous as he was not so cruel then Qin Shihuang! ^^V
Qin Shi Huang was the king of a state of Qin ruling over the whole of China, an unprecedented accomplishment. Wishing to show that he was no longer a simple king like the kings of old during the Warring States Period , he created a new title, huang who ruled at the dawn of Chinese history
They both create the same cruel law(anybody who broke any of the laws would be severely punished harshly and by cruel methods). The different between them was that, Chandragupta Maurya was more reasonable than Qin Shi Huang.
Well.. they simply ruled their empires with cruel punishments.. AND both chandragupta & Qin shihuang did contribute for their coutry.. However i think chandragupta is better ruler than qin shihuang.
40 comments:
Hi,Mr Syed
Qin Shi Huang, after conquering the last independent Chinese state in 221 BCE, Qin Shi Huang was the king of a state of Qin ruling over the whole of China, an unprecedented accomplishment.
He has curel punishments on people who obey him.
Chandragupta Maurya was the king of Maurya. His achievements, which ranged from defeating Alexander's Macedonian satrapies and conquering the Nanda Empire by the time he was only about 20 years old, to defeating Seleucus Nicator and establishing centralized rule throughout Southern Asia, remain some of the most celebrated in Indian history. He had harsh punishment on his men which obey him. Thus, I think they was both good ruler as they contribut many things to their country.
name: angie lim
class:1E3
Well,i guess im the first to give the comment...XD
Ermm...between chandragupta and qin shihuang..I think that chandragupta would make a better ruler than qin shihuang as chandragupta improved the welfare of his people..He build roads,including the Great Royal highway for easy travel..I'm not saying that qin shihuang never improve the welfare of his people.. He do contritute a lot to China's history not to his people. To the people at that time, he is definitely a tyrant, a horrible king. He killed lots of scholars and burned many classic books. And thousands of people died during the construction of the great wall...
Nadia shariff(8)
1E3
both chandragupta maurya and qin shihuang were cruel rulers.they executed or severly punished those who are foung guilty or being disloyal.chandragupta maurya shared his kingdom with who he thinks that are loyal support him.while qin shihuang did not shared his kingdom with anybody.
They are all very cruel but I think that they meant well to people.
Ting Jie
1E3
GDLSS
I learnt about Chandragupta Maurya & Qin Shihuang were rulers of their own empires.They also have different and similarity.
Wardaniah From 1E3
they are both strong and powerful but chandragupta helped many people and Qin Shihuang killed many people
They were both strict with their rules and regulations and even killed people to prove to the public that they were strict with the rules. However they also wanted to show that if you followed the rules,they both would be happy.The difference is that the caste system treated the untouchables like slaves while the class system did not have people like the untouchables. stefan 1A2 greendale secondary school
Chandragupta Maurya and Qin shihuang have their own similarities on how they each ruled their repective empires......i think Chandragupta Maurya was a better ruler because his punishments were never harsher than QinShihuang....even thoughh his punishments wrer also bad....he was never bad to the people under him....Qin Shihuang was very harsh with his punishments....he even sent his own son to another country.....a similarity with the both of them would be that both wanted to rule their respective empires powerfully and without any doubt,both of them were very power ful rulers
Their Similarity Is That Chandragupta Maurya And QinShihuang Ruled Their Empires Strictly And Cruelly.
Their Difference Is That
Chandragupta Maurya Has A Centralized Rule,Where His People Were Divided Into Provinces Under The Rule Of A trusted Governor While QinShihuang ruled by fueldalism Where People Had Land given By The King In return For Their Support.
Emily Yap Hui Yin(18)
1E3
The similarity is thier empire was divided into provinces and the difference are Maurya is a centralized empire while the Qin Dynasty use a govenment system called feudalism.
Ben Tan 1A2
Greendale Secondary
Chandragupta Maurya and Qin Shihuang similar rule is they rule their own empire.
Their differences is Chandraguta Maurya central rule and Qin Shihuang rule iseulcalism.
(apphia kang)
(1e3)
I think 1 different thing between chandragupta maurya and Qin Shihuang was despite harsh punishments to the people, chandragupta is still also known to have improved the welfare of people...but qin shihuang enforced strict laws and not even showed any mercy at all!!The 1 thing similar between both was they both contributed many thing to the country...
Tiffanie
1E3
Greendale Sec
they are both strong and powerful but chandragupta helped many people and Qin Shihuang killed many people
chandragupta would make a better ruler than qin shihuang as chandragupta improved the welfare of his people..He build roads,including the Great Royal highway for easy travel..I'm not saying that qin shihuang never improve the welfare of his people.. He do contritute a lot to China's history not to his people. To the people at that time, he is definitely a tyrant, a horrible king. He killed lots of scholars and burned many classic books. And thousands of people died during the construction of the great wall,he even send his son away
nathalie wong
1e3
hi,mr syed
Qin shihuang is a very curel man that is so unreasonable.He do not have to send his son to another contry just for disagreeing with him and can talk things out but he is so curel that he did not even care about his own son and just send his son to another country so i find him very unreasonable.
name:benny hong
class:1A2
Hi,
Sry for posting so late...
I think that Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya have their good and bad contribution to the society.
But I think that at least Chandragupta Maurya help his people by buildings roads and including Great Royal Highway for easy travel.
Qin Shi huang can be considered a horrible king as he had killed many innocent life.
Jia Ying
1E3
Greendale Secondary School
Hi,
To me I think that Chandragupta maurya is better than Qin Shi Huang. It is because Qin Shi Huang had killed many innocent lifes compared to Chandragupta Maurya he still have consideration for his people he will try to help them by building roads and The Great Royal Highway for easy travel.
The highway connected Pataliputra to the northwestern border areas of Chandragupta's empire.Farmers were able to grow their crops more easily when Chandragupta ordered irrigation systems be maintained to
ensure a steady supply of water to the fields.
Dorcas Koh
1E3
Greendale Secondary School
THE SIMILARITY IS THAT BOTH THE CHANDRAGUPTA MAURYA&QIN SHIHUANG EMPIRES HAD DIVIDED THEIR PROVINCES AND THEY WERE BOTH VERY CRUEL PEOPLE.
1A2
Greendale
Chandragupta and Qin shihuang are both great rulers.The difference between them is Chandragupta set up a war office that consisted of thousands of soldiers and war elephants and Qin shihuang has stict laws.
Conan lim
1A2
hi..their similarity is they ruled their empires cruelly.their difference is that
Chandragupta Maurya has central rule and differences are Maurya is a central empire while the Qin Dynasty use a govenment system called feudalism.
shuwen
1e3
greendale sec.
Hi,mr syed
Qin shi huang was the ruler who subjugated the Warring States and formed China in 221 B.C. He declared himself the first emperor of China and named himself Shi Huangdi (meaning First Emperor). He had a lot of cruel punishemnt on those who did not obey him . All the scolar were buried alive and book we burn that mean he did not want people to rebel him.He also send his son to exlie of other country.one of his great contribution are he build great wall to prevent the people from attacking.
Chandragupta wans the kign of maurya.He untited contry of india and establsing then centralized rule of southen asia. He had harsh law for people who did not obey him.
Thus i think they two ruler have negative and postive contribution.so we could not judge both are them are good ruler.
Name:koh kee sheng [25]
Class:1E3
qin shi huang and chandragupta is very cruel.but qin shi huang is even cruel as he punish his own son.
Terence choo
1E3 (23)
sec 1
Qin Shi Huang is a man that independent Chinese state in 221 BCE.He is a very cruel man.He is same as chandragupta.They punish people so at the end of the day
they were fear of him.
NAME:Jonathan
CLASS:1E3
Both Chandragupta Maurya & Qin Shi Huang were cruel rulers.They both had harsh punishments.
But I think that Qin ShiHuang was more cruel than Chandragupta Maurya as Qin ShiHuang killed those people that were innocent and if the person had done wrong the person 's family including that person will be excuted.
Dorcas Koh
1E3
I think that Qin ShiHuang was a bad ruler as he is violence and harsh ,, even his son was sent away ... He did all the voilence in order to show a good example to the emperor ... that's not worth it i think ... And Chandragupta Maurya was a good ruler , he had beaten his opponent ,, Alexander ...He is a good ruler ... although he is violent but , he's not as voilent as Qin Shi Huang ... he's a better ruler than Qin Shi Huang ... I think that he ought to be the emperor ... hahas ...
::END OF COMMENT::.
Hui Ru//D0raem0n ... =P
Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta maurya were both a bad ruler. Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Muarya does cruel punishments like excuting or punishing people who were guilty and does not obey them.
both of them are very cruel and evil.they have killed many people.but they are different, chandragupta maurya is in India but Qin Shihuang is in china.
Name:Hng Yi Ren
class:1A4
Hi Mr Syed,
Qin Shihuang is a great ruler.In 221 BCE,feudalism ended and was replaced with a centralised government.It is also known as Unitary System Of Government.A prince defeated the other Shi to unify China and establish the Qin Dynasty.
Later,he took on the title of 'Emperor'(Huangdi) and called himself Qin Shihuang,or 'First Emperor Of Qin'.This change from feudalism to a unitary system of government is often reffered to as China's imperial unification.
Signing Off:Khairul Manazil
From Class:1A2
Hi Mr Syed,
Qin Shi Huang is a bad,curel and evil ruler which kills and tourture people that disobey him.And Chandragupta Maurya is a better ruler as comepaired to Qin Shi Huang beacuse he is a emperor and why would people make him the emperor it is beacause people thinks that he is a ruler thats why...
HI........ The difference is One is chinese,another is India!
The similiarity is they are both emperor!!I think Qin Shihuang is a very kind and cruel king.
CLASS:1A2
NAME:;PEI XIAN
Qin Shi Huang was the king of state after ruling over the whole of china with an curel punishments on people who obey ..
Chandragupta Maurya was the king of Maurya. \\
xiuying 1a2
Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta is very cruel.but Qin Shi Huang is even cruel as he punish his own son.
He did all the voilence in order to show a good example to the emperor .He also killed those people that were innocent.
Jolene Ong,1A2
Greendale Sec
The difference betweenn Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is
that they both are different religion.
The similarity between Qin Shuang Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is they both are emperors.
The another simliarity is they are are the most powerful kings would take overthe kingdoms of his weaker rivals to form an empire.
The another difference between Qin Shi Huang and Chandragupta Maurya is Qin Shang Huang is China emperor,and Chandragupta Maurya is the emperor from india.
- GRACE
- 1A2
- Greendale Secondary
qin shi huang is agreat ruler and that is how feudalism started
yo mr syed, qin shihuang was the king of a state ruled by qin shi huang
he is also a cruel ruler cause he punishers people who disobeys him.
from;IMRRAN the great.
The similarity is their empire was divided into provinces.The difference between them is Chandragupta set up a war office that consisted of thousands of soldiers and war elephants and Qin shihuang has strict laws.Qin shihuang is so creul that he even banish his son to another contry for disagreeing with him.
Name:XAN LIM
Class:1A2
Hi,
The different is that chandragupta maurya 's leadership was highly organised while Qin shihuang was not highly well organised.The different is that Qin Shihuang was infamous because he is very cruel while Chandragupta Maurya was famous as he was not so cruel then Qin Shihuang! ^^V
Verlencia Chu(14)
1A2
GDLSS
Qin Shi Huang was the king of a state of Qin ruling over the whole of China, an unprecedented accomplishment. Wishing to show that he was no longer a simple king like the kings of old during the Warring States Period , he created a new title, huang who ruled at the dawn of Chinese history
1E3 PRSPR
Qin Shi Huang was the king of state after ruling over the whole of china with an curel punishments on people who obey ..
from syzwano
They both create the same cruel law(anybody who broke any of the laws would be severely punished harshly and by cruel methods). The different between them was that, Chandragupta Maurya was more reasonable than Qin Shi Huang.
Well.. they simply ruled their empires with cruel punishments.. AND both chandragupta & Qin shihuang did contribute for their coutry.. However i think chandragupta is better ruler than qin shihuang.
kendra[:(1E3)
Post a Comment